Common mistakes EV battery manufacturers make that cost time and money

Sponsored by Nordson Sealant Equipment

Nordson Sealant Equipment is in Wixom, MI, USA and specializes in automated sealing and dispensing for 1-part and 2-part materials used in electric vehicle battery cell manufacturing. Nordson designs and manufacturers meters and valves to precisely dispense sealant and adhesives materials. We proudly partner with most of the top 10 automotive manufacturers globally to enhance their vehicle production. Our leading engineers can provide dispense solutions tailored to a customer’s top priority. Whether it’s EV battery back bonding or sealing battery modules our technology will save you time and money. 

Nordson helps EV battery customer save thousands

Nordson recently met with an existing customer who was looking to increase their production rate in a specific EV battery manufacturing cell. The customer’s current process was dispensing 600 individual 0.3cc shots per battery module totaling 173cc total volume. The entire process took 450 seconds, or seven-and-a-half-minutes to complete. This affected the customer’s production output and their integrator determined that to meet the customer’s target cycle time of 240 seconds they would require a second line to achieve the target production rate. The current seven-and-a-half-minute duration also caused the sealant to cure before the assembly was complete. These challenges had to be resolved or their production would suffer in time and product costs. 

Our team of experts met with the customer and integrator to understand their target process.  The customer needed to decrease their cycle time from seven-and-a half-minutes to 240 seconds, or four minutes altogether. They still wanted 600 individual 0.3cc shots per battery module with a total of 173cc volume per part. The weight of the battery module and speed were incredibly crucial to the performance of the vehicle. We knew the only way to improve this process was to replicate it. 

Our solution exceeds customer’s target

 First the customer took advantage of our onsite material testing lab in Wixom, MI. They shipped us their parts and material, so we could replicate their current process in-house. Our engineers quickly started testing the material properties, bead size, and cycle time.  This data would allow Nordson to provide the customer with the best solution. The material testing lab can take up to two weeks for a thorough analysis but can save thousands for a customer. 

Throughout the testing phase our engineers discovered that the robot was the biggest impact to the cycle time. The robot had to move, stop, dispense, and then move repeatedly to individually dispense the 600 shots accurately. Our engineers decided to alter the shape of the 0.3cc individual shots to a 4.5cc continuous bead to speed up the total dispense time. This solution allowed each battery module to only need 18 continuous beads versus 600 individual shots. The new continuous beads decreased the material usage and weight of the battery in half, from 173cc total volume to 81cc total volume per part. The customer was able to incur a 50% material savings. The entire dispense process only took 65 seconds to complete which surpassed the customer’s goal of 240 seconds. The one minute and five second solution was seven times faster part throughout and eliminated the need for a second line, saving the company thousands. The customer was in astonishment when we shared our findings with them and were quick to implement the new dispense process into their production line. 

(3) Common mistakes in EV battery cell manufacturing

How can OEM, automotive manufacturers, or even you improve your EV battery pack assembly? Nordson has learned what mistakes you could make that can cost a manufacturing plant time and money. There are three common mistakes: choosing the dispense equipment last, not testing your material, and wanting the fastest research and implementation timeline when assembling an EV battery cell and pack.   

The first common mistake is choosing the dispense equipment last. Most OEM and automotive manufacturers begin the research process by contacting a material supplier. Then, they spend a week or two discussing their product and the ideal adhesive or sealant. Once the OEM or auto manufacturer has analyzed multiple materials with a material supplier, they select one. Next, they contact various equipment manufacturers and focus solely on the material chosen and the application needed. The problem is their production output may be impacted. OEM and automotive manufacturers end up paying for a system that simply dispenses the chosen material the best. What they don’t think about is how that material can affect their equipment over time. The equipment may meet their production specifications i.e., speed, accuracy, and volume, but what about the cost of replacement parts, or cost of frequent downtime? The material chosen could be abrasive and wear down the equipment faster than intended. The material may not dispense easily and can cure in hoses and pumps over time causing an increase in unwanted cleanout and downtime. 

The second common mistake is not testing material options with the preferred dispense equipment. As we previously mentioned, most OEM and auto manufacturers select the material first then search for dispense equipment. This can narrow their search options for dispense equipment. If OEMs and auto manufacturers searched for material suppliers and equipment systems at the same time they could improve their process and save costs. At Nordson when we provide a customer with a solution, the material is an incremental step in selecting the equipment. Therefore, we test all the materials they are contemplating and ensure it does not diminish the quality of their EV battery pack. We analyze durability, abrasiveness, volume, application, line speed, cycle time, material usage and anticipated part life time. All these factors impact a customer’s bottom line. Our goal is to make sure they invest in the right equipment and material to maximize their income and ensure they deliver a quality product to their end customers. 

The third common mistake EV battery manufacturers make is wanting the fastest research and implementation timeline. Every organization is up against a deadline; whether they have a customer order or end of the year budgets, something important is driving their delivery time. At Nordson we have realized that not taking time at the beginning of the research phase can negatively impact a manufacturer’s production weeks later. In a traditional timeline, as depicted above, the standard process without any failure in equipment or material, can take roughly 11 weeks from the first contact to the installation and production activation. However, if the material chosen and dispense equipment counteract with one another the entire process could take up to 28 weeks, that’s seven months. Why is that? The most common reason is because they failed to test their material and equipment together before the implementation stage.   This causes the manufacturer to reformulate the material or even reselect or retrofit equipment. These two factors alone could cost them 10 more weeks of downtime. Remember that customer order or year-end budget they were trying to make? Those are no longer achievable. If auto manufacturers and OEMs follow Nordson’s Expertise Process they will learn that by testing their material and equipment in advance it could add three weeks to the standard process without failure, but it could save them a minimum of 14 weeks if something fails. When manufacturers accurately plan, they can realistically deliver to their customer and organization. 

Enhance your EV battery cell manufacturing

The next time automotive manufacturers, OEMs or even you look to enhance your EV battery cell manufacturing make sure you follow these three steps: 1) research your equipment and material at the same time, 2) remember to test your material options with the desired equipment to avoid challenges, and 3) realistically plan your research and implementation process to save you time and money. Nordson Sealant Equipment is always available to help enhance EV battery cell manufacturing. Contact our team today to build the best sealant application for your organization.

GM sets stage for US competing with Norway on EV adoption in new Super Bowl ad with Will Ferrell

GM appears to be setting the stage for the US to challenge Norway’s lead in electric vehicle adoption with a new Super Bowl ad featuring Will Ferrell.

more…

The post GM sets stage for US competing with Norway on EV adoption in new Super Bowl ad with Will Ferrell appeared first on Electrek.


Source: Charge Forward

Nexperia releases 80 V resistor-equipped transistor for 48 V automotive circuits

Nexperia has introduced its 80 V RET (resistor-equipped transistor) family. The company says the new RETs, or “digital transistors,” provide enough headroom for use in 48 V automotive circuits.

RETs save space and reduce manufacturing costs by combining the bias resistor and bias-emitter resistor in the same SOT23 (250 mW Ptot) or SOT323 (235 mW Ptot) package as the transistor. Double RETs (two transistors and two matching bias resistors and bias-emitter resistors) are also available in the SOT363 package with a Ptot of 350 mW.

The new series (NHDTx and NHUMx) includes 42 parts with PNP / NPN combinations. These come with the same bias resistor combinations as Nexperia’s 50 V parts. The devices have a 100 mA current capability and are AEC-Q101-approved.

Product Group Manager Frank Matschullat commented, “Design engineers working on new EV applications can future-proof their systems with confidence by using Nexperia’s new RETs to simplify circuit design, save PCB space, reduce pick and place time and increase reliability. As well as 48 V automotive circuit driver applications, general-purpose switching and amplification and other digital systems will benefit from these new high-voltage devices.”

Rhombus launches new bidirectional charging solution for medium- and heavy-duty EV fleets

Rhombus Energy Solutions has launched a new bidirectional “EV charging dispenser.” The RES-D2-CS20 has been certified by Underwriters Laboratory (UL) and the CSA Group for use in medium- and heavy-duty fleet applications. The company calls it a perfect match for the Rhombus 60 kW and 125 kW Power Conditioning Systems.

Rhombus’s bidirectional charger enables Vehicle-to-Grid (V2G) functionality, which allows fleet operators to return energy to the grid during peak demand hours or to be use it to power buildings in a behind-the-meter scenario.

Rhombus has been building high-power inverters to enable behind-the-meter energy storage for renewable energy systems for several years, and has applied that expertise to the design of its latest-generation bidirectional EV charging systems, which are designed specifically for fleet operators.

Electric utility San Diego Gas and Electric has added Rhombus’s chargers to its approved equipment list.

The company’s energy management system controller and software is embedded in its EV charging systems and smart inverters. Rhombus has built hundreds of V2G-capable chargers and bidirectional smart inverters for various sizes and classes of EVs.

Overlooked gems in Tesla’s Q4 earnings call

Tesla’s latest earnings report was loaded with good news: the company’s sixth straight quarter, and first full year, of profitability; increased sales ($31.5 billion in 2020, compared to $24.6 billion in 2019); a healthy cash position ($19.4 billion as of year-end, compared to $6.3 billion at the end of 2019); and plausible plans for steady increases in production (an estimated 50% annual increase).

What’s not to like? Plenty, apparently. Wall street punished TSLA stock the next day, due to the fact that announced earnings of $0.80 per share were actually a “miss,” falling short of the figure expected by analysts—and probably also due to the fact that net income would have been negative if not for massive sales of regulatory credits ($401 million) to legacy automakers, a revenue source that isn’t expected to continue for much longer. (TSLA shares recovered part of the loss before plunging again the following day, perhaps in response to doubts about the new “koala” steering wheel).

So far, so ho-hum—a stock price drop following a mostly positive earnings report is standard behavior for TSLA. However, also as usual, Elon Musk’s conference call contained some interesting news items for those inclined to look beyond the headlines.

Tesla’s stock-market valuation, which long ago floated free of the company’s share of the global auto market, remains a puzzle to old-school market observers. On the earnings call, the Wag of Wall Street helpfully spelled out something that’s been discussed at length in the EV press: TSLA’s future prospects aren’t tied to how many cars the company sells, but rather to the transformative potential of the cars’ self-driving capabilities.

The world’s richest videogamer explained that once Tesla’s vehicles evolve into self-driving robotaxis, their level of usage will soar—from 12 hours per week to 60 hours per week in Musk’s example. This isn’t going to be a free amenity for owners—Tesla plans to take a piece of the action, generating ongoing revenue on each car after the sale. As a few brilliant visionaries have noted, this transportation-as-a-service model promises to be far more lucrative than the traditional hardware-sales model of the auto industry.

Musk announced that Tesla’s Full Self Driving package will soon be available on a subscription basis, and predicted that even a mere doubling of usage could justify a trillion-dollar valuation for the company. “If you made $50 billion worth of cars, it would be like having $50 billion of incremental profit, basically because it’s just software,” said the Disruptor of Detroit.

Of course, this isn’t the first time we’ve heard about this, and savvy stock-market seers suspect that such a software-subscription scenario is already baked into TSLA’s lofty stock price. It’s anybody’s guess how long it will be before you see a robotaxi on the road. The Full Self Driving package isn’t ready for prime time yet, but little beta birdies have been tweeting that it’s getting very, very close.

Another tasty tidbit—Tesla’s biggest constraint on production at the moment appears to be the supply of batteries. Asked if Tesla had plans for an electric van—a promising niche for electrification—Musk said, “I think Tesla is definitely going to make an electric van at some point, so the thing to bear in mind is that there is fundamentally a constraint on battery cell output. If one is not involved in manufacturing, it’s really hard to appreciate just how hard this scale of production is. It’s the hardest thing in the world. Prototypes are easy. Scaling production is very hard.”

Musk said the Tesla Semi program was also being held hostage to battery cell supply. “We could easily go into production with the Semi, but we would not have enough cells. We would have to supply cells ourselves for Semi when we are producing the 4680 in volume. But for example, Semi would use typically five times the number of cells that a car would use, but it would not sell for five times what a car would sell for. So, it would not make sense for us to do the Semi right now, but it will absolutely make sense for us to do it as soon as we can address the cell production constraint.”

Tesla still plans to begin deliveries of the Tesla Semi this year, but probably at low volume, using 4680 battery cells made at the pilot cell plant in Fremont. The company says it’s on target to produce 10 GWh worth of cells at Fremont this year, and to add 100 GWh of production capacity at the new Berlin and Texas Gigafactories by the end of 2022.

EGEB: New York City to ban new gas hookups by 2030

  • New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio said late last week that the city will “renounce fossil fuels fully.”
  • SunPower and EagleView are working together to reduce solar installation timelines and costs.
  • UnderstandSolar is a free service that links you to top-rated solar installers in your region for personalized solar estimates. Tesla now offers price matching, so it’s important to shop for the best quotes. Click here to learn more and get your quotes. — *ad.

more…

The post EGEB: New York City to ban new gas hookups by 2030 appeared first on Electrek.


Source: Charge Forward