PlugStar Hopes To Train Dealerships To Sell Electric Cars

As anyone who follows the EV scene has surely noticed, auto dealerships are widely considered to be a major bottleneck on the road to EV adoption.

Sales staff tend to be poorly informed about plug-in vehicles, and many dealerships make little effort to present them to buyers as an option. In the worst cases, salespeople steer prospective EV buyers to gas-powered models, or even advise them not to buy the electric models sold by their companies.

***InsideEVs thanks Charles Morris of ChargedEVs for allowing us to share this post with our readers. Check out ChargedEVs.com here.

PlugStar, a subsidiary of the non-profit organization Plug In America, is dedicated to breaking this bottleneck, providing EV-specific training to dealers and their sales staff, and recommending best practices to dealerships that want to sell more EVs.

The first question you may be asking is: Why is a third-party outfit needed? Isn’t this something that automakers should be doing for themselves? Well, they should, and some are trying, but several studies of the issue have found that their efforts simply aren’t sufficient. This isn’t an unprecedented situation – in times of rapid technological change, interested parties sometimes have to take proactive steps to help a technical transition along, instead of waiting for the market to catch up. And after all, it’s quite common for companies to bring in third-party vendors to provide training or other services that the companies can’t or won’t provide in-house for whatever reason.

If you’re the skeptical sort, your second question might be: What’s the point? Dealers are surely a bunch of old-fashioned gearheads who scoff at EVs and are still hoping they’ll go away, right? Well, while some auto dealers may fit this caricature, there are some 18,000 new car dealerships in the US, so sweeping generalizations about their motivations probably aren’t worth much. After hearing what the principals of PlugStar have to say, we’re convinced that most auto dealers would be happy to embrace the new technology and make some money selling EVs, but they need help acquiring the necessary skills to do so.

Charged spoke with PlugStar Program Director Eric Cahill, and East Coast Trainer and Program Assistant Tom Moloughney (who is also a consultant for the EV industry and a writer who has penned many articles for InsideEVs and other publications).

What’s PlugStar doing?

PlugStar got started in December 2016, and since then it has completed several pilot projects in California and one in the Greater Boston area, covering around 100 dealerships in all. Now the company is proceeding with a project in New Jersey, which will represent a second and more substantial iteration of the program.

“In the first few pilots, we were providing training and some limited assets for dealerships that are selling EVs,” Eric Cahill told Charged. “We were working pretty much with the hand-raisers, the dealers who had expressed a willingness to part with a couple of their salespeople and allow us to spend half a day training them to be EV specialists for the dealership.”

For the first generation of its dealership training program, PlugStar developed a PowerPoint presentation that includes between 100 and 200 slides. “It’s pretty comprehensive, and covers a lot of topics to help the client advisors understand plug-in vehicle customers and cater to their needs,” says Tom Moloughney.

PlugStar designed its program, and continues to refine it, based on extensive conversations with auto dealers. Cahill worked on a couple of studies, including one funded by the California Energy Commission, that involved visiting dealerships to interview salespeople, sales managers, owners and principals “to understand what the pain points were for the dealership.”

“Sales folks are very forthcoming, generally,” Cahill told us. “Once they got to talking, I was able to catalog a lot of low-hanging fruit – easy things that the dealership could be doing to improve their EV sales. It was kind of a cross-section of best practices. I was talking across makes, covering Chevy, Ford, Nissan and even Tesla, and getting an idea of how this stuff works on the ground. That was the basis of the notion that there needed to be a whole fleet of resources available to dealers that they just aren’t getting from the automakers.”

Many of the OEMs do have internal training programs for EV sales, but some are more comprehensive than others. “BMW does a really good job at it,” says Moloughney. “They have a team that travels around the country and has regional training sessions, and each dealer has to have one or two BMW-certified salespeople. I think of all the OEMs, they may have done the best job at investing in training to get their client advisors up to speed. I was part of one of their training programs in the past, which is why Plug In America reached out to me to get involved in PlugStar.”

As more car buyers are becoming aware of EVs, the need for dealers to be knowledgeable about them is growing. “The early adopters came in and knew exactly what they wanted, but as we’re moving towards more of the mainstream [buyers], they need a little bit more handholding,” Moloughney explains. “What the PlugStar program is doing, hopefully, is shortening the sales process. The client advisors will be better informed, and they’ll have literature at their desks that they can quickly scroll through if they don’t know the answer to a question off the top of their head.”

Plug In America also maintains a consumer-facing web site (https://plugstar.zappyride.com) that buyers can use to inform themselves about plug-in vehicles before they go to a dealership. The idea is to shorten the sales cycle, as Moloughney explains. “The customer will come to the web site and look at all the different EVs that are for sale, and then we can recommend local dealers that are PlugStar-certified. The customer can cross-shop different cars, and then they can say, ‘I think I want to look at a Nissan LEAF and a BMW i,’ and then we’ll say, ‘these are the dealers we recommend you go to because they understand electric vehicles.’”

Who’s paying for it?

Plug In America gets funding from a wide variety of sources, including philanthropic organizations, foundations, utilities and automakers. The PlugStar program has been getting funding from different organizations for each of its specific projects. The utility SDG&E funded the Southern California training program, and a DOE grant provided funds for the Boston program.

“Ideally we’d love to see this program adopted nationally or at least at the state level,” says Cahill. “To have it in one region and not another is not ideal, but right now, we’re at the regional level because that’s where utilities are responsive.”

The upcoming New Jersey program will be the first one to get some of its funding from the auto dealers themselves. ChargEVC, an industry consortium supporting electrification, and NJ CAR, the state dealer association, will be funding the program management, including printing and clerical work. However, as Moloughney explains, “the actual cost to do the training is going to be passed on to the dealers, and that’s going to be the first time, because in the pilot programs we offered the training for free. Now that we’ve had some experience and we’ve trained maybe a hundred dealers, we can say, ‘Look, we’ve done a certain amount of training in three different states now and here’s the value that we offer to you.’”

Electric utilities have been a major source of funding, and Cahill expects that to continue. “The utilities have an economic incentive to get behind electric vehicles, especially here in California, because of the various mandates and laws that require them to,” he says. “We’ve had interest from Georgia, Washington, Oregon and Colorado utilities as well.”

“There’s also the utility business case that they’ve got essentially unused electricity at night, and electric cars can actually monetize that energy,” says Cahill. “For the utilities, it’s not just a simple case of selling more electricity – in fact they have electricity that’s being generated and going to waste. You have your baseload power plants – coal, natural gas, nuclear, or whatever – and those are always spinning right through the wee hours of the morning. It’s just not being used. Electric cars essentially put that wasted energy to use and provide an additional revenue stream that wasn’t there before.”

Another attraction for utilities is the potential in the not-too-distant future to use vehicle-to-grid (V2G) technology to help stabilize the grid. “Utilities can use electric cars during the day to help them do peak shaving, to store energy, and to deploy that energy during the peak hours, store energy cheaper, and when renewables are doing the work, and then put that energy to work during peak,” says Cahill. “That means less capital outlays on new plants and equipment.”

Cahill sees a parallel with the rapid spread of air conditioning in the 1950s. “The charter of utilities is to keep their customers happy. They want to make sure that their infrastructure is able to grow with the demand for electric cars, so they don’t have situations where you’re getting brownouts or it’s overloading a transformer and the whole neighborhood goes down.”

Why dealers hatin’ on EVs, anyway?

“Dealers have gotten a lot of negative feedback about selling EVs, and a lot they deserve, but having talked to dozens and dozens, I’ve come to realize they really don’t have anything against EVs, it’s just that they’re there to make money,” said Moloughney. “EVs have posed a problem for them, and we’re hoping to solve the problem.”

Moloughney debunks a couple of common bugaboos. Do dealers discourage EV sales because they’re afraid of losing revenue on service? “No. The sales person doesn’t care about the service. It doesn’t matter to them if the dealership makes a penny on service.” Surely there’s some kind of conspiracy. Are dealerships in bed with the oil companies? “They’re not. These are independent dealerships. They’re not trying to slow down electric car adoption or promote oil. They’re just trying to sell cars and put food on the table.”

A few dealerships are doing quite well selling EVs, and not all are in California. In Charged’s home city of St Petersburg, Florida, Maher Chevrolet is pushing Volts and Bolts – the dealership claims to be the biggest Volt seller in the Southeast. Moloughney doesn’t find this surprising. “The crazy thing is that there’s probably another Chevy dealership within four or five miles of him that doesn’t sell a fifth of the plug-in cars that he does. That proves the point. The cars will sell if the dealership is prepared, is serious and is dedicated to selling them. Every market we go into, we’ll find one or two dealerships that are just killing it. One Chevy dealership I know is moving like 30 Volts a month. There are other dealers a couple miles away that sell one a month. They’re in the same market. They have the same customers. What’s going on?”

What indeed? Unsurprisingly, the main reasons most dealers aren’t selling plug-ins seem to have to do with time and money. “Electric vehicles take longer to sell because the customers have a lot of questions and they’re more apprehensive about it – and in a dealership, time is money,” says Moloughney. “If you’re working on commission, would you rather sell a car that takes you five hours to close the deal, or one that takes an hour and a half?”

Also, in some instances there are lower margins. “Many of the early wave of electric vehicles were compliance cars,” Moloughney explains. “The manufacturers had to sell them, but they were losing money on each one, so they had smaller margins. Now that’s going to change as more and more electric vehicles come to the market.”

In many cases, the client advisors can’t answer basic questions, so the sales process for an EV can be a case of the blind leading the blind. “Many customers’ first question is ‘What do I do if I run out of charge?’ If that client advisor’s never driven an electric car, and really hasn’t done his research, his answer might be, ‘Well, you’re out of luck.’ They know little more than the customers do. So you’ve got somebody coming in asking nonsensical questions, and you’ve got a person there trying to sell a car and make a living. You know how much easier it is to say, ‘Why are you wasting your time with that LEAF? Come over here, I’ve got this Versa, it’s $8,000 less, and you know where to get gas.’”

“Another big problem is turnover in dealerships,” Moloughney continues. “Most dealers have three or four salespeople that have been there for a long time, and 10 people that are transient – they work there for a couple months, and then they move on to something else. So even if they really train the sales people on electric vehicles, in a couple months, they have a whole new wave of people, and they just can’t keep up with it.”

PlugStar’s consumer web site is designed to help answer some of the common questions early in the sales process. “We have a blog that answers basic questions about living with an electric car. What do you do if you run out of charge? How long do the batteries last? If the consumer can get all that information from us before they go to a dealership, we’re stacking the deck in our favor.”

“The dealers are kind of out on a limb having to sell these things,” adds Cahill. “The ZEV mandate requires automakers to sell them, but essentially, it’s the dealers who are selling them. Many of them get these EVs, at least some of them feel that they’re kind of dumped on them, and they’re not given the necessary tools to sell them.”

As Elon Musk perceived long ago, traditional auto dealerships are unsuited to selling EVs for several reasons. “When you try to introduce a disruptive product into a mature industry, you’ve got to do some things differently in order to get customers comfortable with the idea of switching from one platform and its ecosystem over to your platform,” says Cahill.

Cahill sees parallels with the history of the consumer electronics industry. “Back in the 80s and 90s, Microsoft and IBM essentially owned over 90% of the market. Apple struggled mightily trying to compete with Windows machines, because they were half the price, and they were being sold through consumer electronics stores and other retail outlets. I think this is what motivated Jobs to do the factory store concept, where they have a lot more control over the experience. It was about branding, about establishing the association between the Apple brand and that kind of clean, user-intuitive aesthetic.

“Tesla kind of took a page right out of that playbook. Electric cars are a disruptive product. You’re asking the customer to make some substantial changes in how they interact with the product, like charging a car as opposed to going to a gas pump, relying on charging infrastructure that is still very immature.

“That’s why automakers and their dealer networks struggle, because these are organizations that aren’t used to introducing a disruptive product. The last time they introduced a disruptive product was almost a century ago.

“You can certainly appreciate some of the benefits of the franchise model, but that model is optimized to deliver products that people are largely familiar with. When you’re introducing an electric car, you’re talking about fundamentally different technology. On the sales channel side, it’s hard to switch from a model where you’re selling based on volume to a model where your primary goal is just to get customers comfortable with something new.

“The franchise sales channel was designed for a mature market. We have demand and it’s all about just moving metal. Electric cars are the antithesis of that. It’s more about exposing customers to the technology, and less about moving volume. That’s one of the big gap areas for your typical dealership.”

Be all that as it may, the legacy automakers are stuck with their legacy dealerships. The OEMs don’t have the option of trying some other sales channel. They have to sell a 21st-century product using a 20th-century sales channel, and PlugStar’s mission is to help bridge that gap.

How much influence do the OEMs have?

Observing the OEMs’ on-again, off-again efforts to push their EVs, one gets the impression that there are pro-EV and anti-EV factions in the executive suites, and that these can shift over time with internal politics. Moloughney, who has done consulting work for several major OEMs, is convinced that this is true. “There are people that really believe that [electrification] is the future, and they press the company to accelerate their plans, and there are other people that say, ‘Well, we’re not really quite sure…let’s hedge our bets.’ I think you’re going to find that in every company.”

Big Auto knows the transition to EVs is coming, but the companies aren’t exactly looking forward to it. Over the past few months, executives at several major automakers have conceded that they expect electrification to be a money-losing proposition for their brands. Global automakers are in the bizarre position of slowly but steadily improving their EV offerings, while working behind the scenes to water down or eliminate the government regulations that are forcing them to produce EVs in the first place. That being the case, breaking the dealership bottleneck is not likely to be a priority for automakers, although that could change once battery costs come down and consumer demand picks up. But is this a problem they could solve, even if they wanted to, or is it beyond their control?

“There’s not a lot they can do,” says Moloughney. “They can’t punish the dealers as much as they can offer carrots.” One dealer that sells a tremendous number of Chevy Bolts told Moloughney, “I want trucks and SUVs, and Chevy wants us to sell these Bolts, so the more Bolts I sell, the more trucks they give me. It’s directly tied to my inventory. If I keep hitting my numbers and selling the plug-in cars that they want me to sell, they give me the SUVs and trucks that I want.” He said, “We’re very aggressive. We try to train the dealers, but now we see that you’re going to help us, so we’re going to send four or five of our sales people to your training. I want to sell more Volts because our allotment is tied to how many electric cars we sell.”

“We’ve had representatives from most of the larger OEMs at our training sessions already,” says Moloughney. “We’ve invited them, and they’ve come, to their credit, and many of them have given us some pointers. We’ll host a dealer training session, and we give them an intake survey and an exit survey. We ask for comments: What did you like? What would you like to read more about?

“We’ve been honing this program now for 18 months, and the OEMs have given us feedback, for example: ‘You’re spending too much time on batteries,’ or: ‘You need to spend more time on incentives, because I think our dealers are having problems explaining the federal tax credit and local incentives.’

“So we’ve used tons of data and feedback we’ve got from the OEMs, as well as the client advisors, and have gradually refined this program to the point where we are now. They’re actually very welcoming. We’re doing some of their job for them, and not charging them anything for it. So they’ve been quite helpful, and happy that we’re out there doing this.”

What are best practices for selling EVs?

After two years of listening to OEMs, dealers, buyers and other interested parties, PlugStar has developed a list of best practices, which forms the core of its training materials. So what should dealers who want to sell EVs be doing?

The main thing is to make the dealership environment welcoming for EV buyers. “We recommend having charging on-site, and having electric vehicles in their dealership loaner program,” says Moloughney. “We recommend that they have a prominent place on their showroom floor reserved for an electric car, and have the car plugged into a charging station, so when people walk by, it gets their attention. ‘Oh, this car has a plug in it!’ That opens up a conversation. Maybe they’re not coming in for an electric car now, but they start thinking about it.

“We also recommend that they have at least two sales people trained as EV specialists. We’d like the whole dealership to be trained, but that might not be possible. So we recommend that they always have at least two people on hand who can answer anyone’s questions about electric vehicles. The worst thing you can do is say, ‘We don’t have that answer. We’ll call you tomorrow.’ If you don’t have someone on hand who can answer that question about batteries, about charging stations, about the difference between a Tesla plug and a LEAF plug, you’re going to lose the sale.”

“The minimum requirement for our program is to designate at least two people from your staff, preferably one per shift, who are going to be your EV specialists – your geniuses, your gurus, whatever you want to call them,” says Cahill. “These are folks who have the right talking points for common questions they will get from customers interested in electric cars. Always make sure you’ve got somebody there, so you’re not saying, ‘Well, that guy’s gone today,’ or ‘He’s out to lunch.’”

Moloughney explains that PlugStar tailors its program to each specific state and region. “We thoroughly explain every electric vehicle incentive that the state offers. Also, part of the program talks about the economic value of driving electric – we dive into the actual electricity costs in each area, and we provide that to the client advisors so they can do quick calculations when a customer comes in. They can say, ‘Oh, you live in Brookline? Well in Brookline, your electricity cost is $0.15 a kilowatt-hour.’ So they can quickly do back-of-the-napkin math, and inform the customer how much it’ll cost to drive that car 10,000 miles a year.

“That’s a powerful tool that the client advisors didn’t have up to now. If a customer asked the sales person, ‘How much will this cost me to charge?’ they would get a blank stare back. But our PlugStar-certified client advisors can give them an answer in a minute. ‘You live in this area? This is what your utility charge is.’

“That’s a lot of work on our side, because we have to contact all the utilities. Some states have 10 different utilities. We have to find out what they’re charging, and if they have time-of-use plans.”

One of the customer “pain points,” as Cahill puts it, is trust, which sales people can earn by displaying knowledge about the product. “As you know, customers, especially early adopters, are predisposed to distrust car dealers. If sales people know nothing about EVs, that destroys trust. Assigning a couple of folks to be the specialists help to build that trust.”

One pain point for dealers is that early-adopter customers often coming in knowing more than they do. “They’ve done their homework, so it’s a stark contrast. [Sales people] feel kind of incompetent, which undermines their confidence, and the two go hand in hand – competence and confidence. And the sales person really needs to feel confident. They’ve got to have the knowledge to feel competent about it, and the problem with electric cars in dealerships is they might only start out by selling two or three a month. That’s just not enough to reinforce the knowledge and the expertise in the EV ecosystem.”

Product knowledge is critically important, but it’s not the whole story. Cahill sees training as one leg of the proverbial three-legged stool – a successful program needs all three legs, and the first one is a commitment from the dealership. “You’ve got to set some minimum standards, and ask dealers to step out and make a commitment to meet these additional standards.”

“The other key leg of the stool is you have to give them the training, the tools, and the support that they need to do the job,” Cahill continues. “These are volume-based businesses, so one of the key things that your tools can do is allow them to keep turning metal. It’s all about the sales cycle, so the more our program can shorten their sales cycle, the more welcoming they’re going to be.

“And, of course, we have to give them these assets across a number of different media. You need to have print materials, online materials, smartphone-friendly tools or apps – a mix of all the stuff. Training manuals that they can take back and use as reference. Crib sheets – a quick one-pager that they can use to quickly reference something. Those are the kind of assets that we provide.

“The third leg of the stool is the rewards piece. You need to give them money, you need to give them sales leads, and you need to give them recognition – a pat on the back to show them that you appreciate the fact that they’re stepping out and taking risk.

“We’ve built a lead generation platform that is dedicated to electric cars. It’s been built from the ground up to cater to the new considerations that electric car shoppers face. Many of the third-party car shopping sites, where people go to start their shopping journey, are pretty clunky with regard to electric cars. EVs are kind of bolted on as a vehicle category in the same way that SUVs and trucks are kind of bolted on.

“The site has to be able to cater to these kinds of early adopter considerations, and mainstream buyer considerations as well, since what you’re ultimately trying to do is get them over that chasm between the early adopter and the early majority.”

And of course, everyone – especially car dealers – likes a little extra money. One criticism of the existing system of tax credits and rebates is that it doesn’t give the dealers any incentives. The state of Connecticut recently tested a program called CHEAPR, which offered a cash rebate “on the hood” instead of a tax break, and earmarked a portion of the rebate for the salesperson. “I think the idea of cash on the hood is a good one,” says Cahill, “because ultimately what you’re trying to do is lubricate a deal. If you want an electric car to be sold, put some money into the deal. Maybe some or all of it ends up in the dealer’s pocket, maybe some of it ends up in the consumer’s pocket, but the bottom line is the deal gets done. An electric car gets sold and everybody’s happy.” 

This article appeared in Charged Issue 40 – November/December 2018 

Source: ChargedEVs


Source: Electric Vehicle News

Red Wine Versus Tesla Model 3 White Seats: Video

It’s the real-life red wine test. Oh boy!

Tesla’s Elon Musk claims the white seats in the Model 3 can stand up to red wine without staining. Normally, one would just take his word for it, but not this fella.

Instead of just believing the claim, this Model 3 owner went ahead and poured red wine all over his new Model 3 white seats.

Did it stain? Was it difficult to clean up? Were the claims made by Musk true? Let’s find out. It’s video watching time.

**Note: We still suggest you refrain from trying this on your own white Tesla seats.

Video description:

“Insane testing.”

Spilling RED Wine on my 1-month-old Tesla Model 3 white seat!

Elon Musk mentioned before: “The white seats are actually extremely stain resistant. You can spill red wine on the seats & just wipe it off.”

So I did it!

See the tweet from Vincent, friend of InsideEVs, below:


Source: Electric Vehicle News

London Taxi-Based Electric Van Delayed

It’s no longer taxi-based, either.

The London Electric Vehicle Company (LEVC) is holding off from launching its new van based on its hybrid London taxi.

The Geely-owned firm has put the decision down to ‘stiffer competition and global market changes’, according to Automotive News Europe.

Development for the van had been completed and it was expected to be launched this year, but it now looks set to arrive in two years time at the earliest.

“Like the rest of the industry, we are facing a number of macro challenges, stiffer competition and developing technology,” LEVC CEO Chris Gubbey told the outlet.

The van is being developed by Geely’s New Energy Commercial Vehicles (GVC) company to make it viable for the Chinese market, but it will still be built in Britain for the European market. It is expected to make up half the output of LEVC’s Coventry plant by 2022 – roughly 5,000 units a year. It sold 1,200 hybrid TX taxis last year.

The make-up of the van is also changing. While it will remain a plug-in hybrid as planned, it will no longer be based on the Taxi architecture, which itself shares a lot in common with the Volvo XC90.

“The architecture is not 100 percent set, but it will be a new development,” said Gubbey. “That’s what’s driving the timing difference.”

The change in architecture for the van will help it bring the price down, having initially expected to out-price its target market. It will still be pricey though, expecting to cost in the region of £56,000, much like LEVC’s TX taxi. That will also allow it to compete with the likes of Ford and Peugeot which are both planning to release hybrid and electric vans respectively.


Source: Electric Vehicle News

Audi Holoride Tech Transforms Road Trips Into VR Gaming: Video

Audi says it will be available to the public within three years.

Audi is bringing virtual reality gaming to the car with its new Holoride technology. Unveiled at the Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas, Nevada, Holoride relies on VR goggles that backseat passengers wear. Users then view a virtual world that syncs up with the motions of the vehicle.

“If the car turns a tight corner, the player curves around an opposing spaceship in virtual reality. If the Audi E-Tron accelerates, the ship in the experience does the same,” Audi wrote in a press release.

While Audi noted that Holoride uses an open-platform that other automakers and developers can use and add to in the future, the brand only used the technology to showcase  “Marvel’s Avengers: Rocket’s Rescue Run,” a VR game that sees the user sitting in the space ship from the film Guardians of the Galaxy.

Of course, this isn’t Audi’s first rodeo in the Marvel universe, as the automaker famously gave Tony Stark the keys to an Audi R8 in Iron Man (Stark more recently piloted a new A8 in Spider-Man: Homecoming). Nor do we expect this to be the last venture between Marvel and Audi, and we can envision a future Holoride game based upon Marvel characters such as Ant-Man or Ghost Rider.

Although the feather in Holoride’s cap is currently its ability sync virtual worlds with the movements of a passenger vehicle, future iterations of the technology will possibly use vehicle-to-infrastructure communication to implement traffic events into the user experience.

Regardless, the German brand believes Holoride will be available to vehicle owners within the next three years. While the technology certainly looks cool, we can’t help but feel it may also be a wee bit nauseating. Hopefully, we’ll have the opportunity to test Holoride for ourselves to find out just how well the VR system works in the real world.


Source: Electric Vehicle News

2019 Harley-Davidson LiveWire: Everything We Know

We finally have the full portrait.

Five years in the making and we finally get to know (pretty much) everything there is to know about Harley-Davidson‘s first step into electrification: the LiveWire.

The manufacturer announced it would start working on its very first electric motorcycle over 5 years ago. Already at the time, the company had expressed the desire to diversify its audience. In 2014, the then dubbed “Project LiveWire” prototype started touring Harley dealers and motorcycle shows to get feedback and impressions from the public. Then, we waited. And waited.

Springs Back To Life

For a few years, the project was almost completely forgotten and while it had created much hype back when it was first announced, the LiveWire became a bit of a Loch Monster: some people say they have seen it but nobody has proven its existence. Finally, as 2108 rolled in, H-D looked about ready for the commitment. With the promise of an official launch in 2019, the company started name-dropping the LiveWire once more.

The design has remained virtually the same as the Project LiveWire prototype, except for the addition of a front cowl. The new design introduces a much more modern aesthetic to the century-old company’s lineup. The bike is built on a lightweight aluminum chassis. The exposed frame, floating upward tail, and naked silhouette are a stark contrast from the typical Harley—exactly what the company is aiming to do with what it hopes will help kindle a younger audience’s curiosity. The electric powertrain is set low within the frame to send the weight towards the ground and keep a low center of gravity.

The company opted for a stiffer chassis to make the ride more engaging and responsive. The LiveWire comes fitted with Brembo front brakes, ABS, and traction control. Riders will have the choice of 7 different riding modes to adapt to their needs.

2019 Harley-Davidson LiveWire

Electric Feature

A new feature, alien to the rest of the lineup, is the “twist and go. Since its electric, the LiveWire neither has a clutch nor a gear selector. You only have to, well, twist and go. The company has also been selling the model’s performance, with the promise of a 0-to-60 in 3.5 seconds thanks to its electric powertrain. You can have all the range anxiety in the world: you have to admit that electric vehicles offer entertaining take offs.

The bike will also be connected via the H-D connect. This provides the owner with such useful information as battery status, parking location, service reminders, and even a tracker should the motorcycle get stolen.

CES Reveal

At CES 2019, the company finally completed the portrait it started painting 5 years ago. It unveiled the numbers everyone had been begging to know: range and pricing. Powered by Harley’s Revelation powertrain, the 2019 LiveWire will provide users with an estimated 110-mile range in the city.

Charging times are listed by Harley as follow:

  • Level 1 (standard household outlet): 13 miles range per hour of charged.
  • Level 2: LiveWire can be connected to a Level 2 charge unit but will be charged at the Level 1 rate.
  • DC Fast Charge: 192 miles range per hour charged.

In common language, this means a full charge will take between 8 and 9 hours on a standard outlet. Less than an hour on a fast charger.

As for pricing, the tag has been set at $29,799. The model will be available in three colors starting August 2019.


Source: Electric Vehicle News

Let’s Look At CATL’s Numerous Battery Deals

Mega-player in the battery biz.

Chinese power battery manufacturer Contemporary Amperex Technology Limited (CATL) and Zhejiang Jirun Automobile Company Limited (Zhejiang Jirun), a subsidiary held by Zhejiang Geely Holding Group, struck a deal on December 20, 2018 to fund a joint venture (JV) that works on the R&D, manufacture and sale of battery cells and battery packs. CATL will hold the majority share of the JV with 51 percent.

CATL Geely JV, CATL China OEM cooperation, CATL GAC JV, China automotive news

Aside from Geely, CATL also agreed cooperation agreements with other automakers like SAIC Motor, Dongfeng Motor, GAC Group and Jiangling Motors, etc., making it the China-based power battery maker who has most joint ventures with OEMs.

CATL Geely JV, CATL China OEM cooperation, CATL GAC JV, China automotive news

SAIC Motor was the first one that set up joint ventures with CATL. They established two companies in 2017: CATL-SAIC Motor Power Battery Co.,Ltd to develop, produce and sell lithium ion batteries (with a registered capital of RMB 2 billion); the other dubbed SAIC Motor-CATL Power Battery System Co.,Ltd to develop, produce and sell battery systems (with a registered capital of RMB 300million).

CATL Geely JV, CATL China OEM cooperation, CATL GAC JV, China automotive news

On July 4, 2018, a 50/50 joint venture between Dongfeng Motor and CATL dubbed Dongfeng-CATL (Wuhan) Battery System Co.,Ltd was put into operation. With a registered capital of RMB100 million, the JV specializes in developing, producing and selling NEV power batteries. Reportedly, it will complete the construction of three production lines in 2019 and is expected to produce 192,000 sets of battery systems and total capacity of 9.6GWh on an annual basis and generate RMB11.4 billion of yearly output value by 2020.

CATL Geely JV, CATL China OEM cooperation, CATL GAC JV, China automotive news

During the same month, CATL and GAC Group reached an agreement to build two joint ventures dubbed CATL-GAC Power Battery Co.,Ltd and GAC-CATL Power Battery System Co.,Ltd, focusing on producing battery cells and supplying battery systems respectively. The foundation stone-laying ceremony of the JV’s production base took place on December 23 and base is predicted to be put into operation next year.

Apart from building JVs with domestic carmaker, CATL also formed partnerships with Volkswagen, Daimler and BMW Brilliance last year to supply them with power batteries.

We can learn from the cases mentioned above that CATL is really a popular collaborator whom OEMs intend to work with. As mainstream automakers are flocking into the NEV domain, power battery is crucial and essential for companies to develop NEVs. However, independent R&D of batteries involves extremely high costs and multiple technology barriers. Thus, teaming up with battery makers is a good option for OEMs to ensure quality and control costs. Additionally, the cooperation with CATL will be an attractive point for company’s brand promotion by virtue of its “celebrity” feature in China’s NEV battery industry.

Public data shows that CATL has been constantly holding the championship by monthly installed battery capacity with 1.47GWh, 2.45GWh, 2.49GWh and 3.4GWh produced respectively from August to November in 2018.

Source: Gasgoo


Source: Electric Vehicle News

Redline Reviews Checks Out Nissan LEAF e+ At CES: Video

The world would look different if the e+ was ready two years ago.

Redline Reviews was one of the first who took a look on the new Nissan LEAF e+ at CES.

The Japanese electric flagship received a 62 kWh battery for up to 364 km (226 miles) of expected EPA range. Additionally, it gets a 160 kW electric motor and increased charging power to 70 kW (100 kW peak).

The main change inside is the bigger infotainment screen (8-inch) and newer software. Redline Reviews noticed also that the floor seems to be raised a little bit because of the new battery.

Nissan LEAF e+ specs (vs. LEAF 40 kWh)

  • 62 kWh battery (+55% capacity over 40 kWh, 25% more energy dense lithium-ion cells, similar size)
  • 288 lithium-ion cells (vs. compared to 192 cells)
  • battery limited warranty of 8 years/160,000 km (whichever occurs first) is standard
  • 364 km (226 miles) of expected EPA range (up 50% from 243 km/151 miles)
  • 385 km (239 miles) of WLTP range in Europe (vs. 285 km/177 miles)
  • 458 km (285 miles) of WLTC Japan range in Japan (vs. 322 km/200 miles)
  • 570 km (354 miles) of JC08 range in Japan (vs. 400 km/249 miles)
  • 160 kW electric motor (up from 110 kW) and 250 lb-ft (340 Nm) (vs. 320 Nm in 40 kWh version)
  • 70 kW (100 kW peak) fast charging using CHAdeMO (vs. less than 50 kW)
Nissan LEAF e+

7 photos
Nissan LEAF e+
Nissan LEAF e+
Nissan LEAF e+
Nissan LEAF e+
Nissan LEAF e+
Nissan LEAF e+
2019 Nissan LEAF e+

57 photos
2019 Nissan LEAF e+
2019 Nissan LEAF e+
2019 Nissan LEAF e+
2019 Nissan LEAF e+
2019 Nissan LEAF e+
2019 Nissan LEAF e+
2019 Nissan LEAF e+
2019 Nissan LEAF e+
2019 Nissan LEAF e+
2019 Nissan LEAF e+
2019 Nissan LEAF e+
2019 Nissan LEAF e+
2019 Nissan LEAF e+
The neavw 2019 Nissan LEAF e+ has a 62 kWh battery pack and an EPA-estimated range of up to 226 miles. Sales in the U.S. are expected to begin in spring 2019.
2019 Nissan LEAF e+
2019 Nissan LEAF e+
2019 Nissan LEAF e+
2019 Nissan LEAF e+
2019 Nissan LEAF e+
2019 Nissan LEAF e+
2019 Nissan LEAF e+
2019 Nissan LEAF e+
2019 Nissan LEAF e+
2019 Nissan LEAF e+
2019 Nissan LEAF e+
2019 Nissan LEAF e+ batteries
2019 Nissan LEAF e+ batteries
2019 Nissan LEAF e+ batteries
2019 Nissan LEAF e+ batteries
2019 Nissan LEAF e+ batteries
2019 Nissan LEAF e+ batteries
2019 Nissan LEAF e+ batteries
2019 Nissan LEAF e+ batteries
2019 Nissan LEAF e+ batteries
2019 Nissan LEAF e+ batteries
2019 Nissan LEAF e+ batteries
2019 Nissan LEAF e+ batteries
2019 Nissan LEAF e+ batteries
2019 Nissan LEAF e+ batteries
2019 Nissan LEAF e+ batteries
2019 Nissan LEAF e+
2019 Nissan LEAF e+
2019 Nissan LEAF e+
2019 Nissan LEAF e+
2019 Nissan LEAF e+
2019 Nissan LEAF e+
2019 Nissan LEAF e+
2019 Nissan LEAF e+
2019 Nissan LEAF e+
2019 Nissan LEAF e+
2019 Nissan LEAF e+
2019 Nissan LEAF e+
2019 Nissan LEAF e+
2019 Nissan LEAF e+ in Japan
2019 Nissan LEAF e+ in Japan
2019 Nissan LEAF e+ in Japan

A short video was released also by Roadshow:

.embed-container { position: relative; padding-bottom: 56.25%; height: 0; overflow: hidden; max-width: 100%; } .embed-container iframe, .embed-container object, .embed-container embed { position: absolute; top: 0; left: 0; width: 100%; height: 100%; }


Source: Electric Vehicle News

Seamless EV Charging Is Catching On In North America

NORTH AMERICAN CHARGING NETWORKS MOVE TO ENABLE SEAMLESS ROAMING FOR EV CHARGING

Electric vehicles are often compared to mobile phones. Among other similarities, both devices depend on a stack of interdependent hardware, software and services, and both need to be plugged in and charged after use, normally in the evening.

*This article comes to us courtesy of EVANNEX (which also makes aftermarket Tesla accessories). Authored by Charles Morris. The opinions expressed in these articles are not necessarily our own at InsideEVs.

Above: A Tesla Model X does some public charging at a Greenlots charging point in Ohio (Source: Greenlots)

A critical step in creating today’s mobile phone ecosystem was the development of roaming – a seamless handover from one service provider to another, invisible to the consumer. An analogous system is gradually coming into existence to handle EV charging. Public chargers are operated by a patchwork of operators around the world, and drivers need to be able to use the nearest and most convenient charging stations, without worrying about setting up multiple accounts or carrying around multiple access cards.

Two of North America’s largest charging networks, Greenlots and ChargePoint, recently formed a roaming partnership that will enable charging across both networks. Beginning in mid-2019, customers will be able to charge on either the ChargePoint or Greenlots networks without the need to create separate accounts or pay additional fees, enabling a seamless charging experience. Drivers will be able to use the Greenlots or ChargePoint mobile applications to locate charging stations, activate charging sessions, and pay for charging.

.embed-container { position: relative; padding-bottom: 56.25%; height: 0; overflow: hidden; max-width: 100%; } .embed-container iframe, .embed-container object, .embed-container embed { position: absolute; top: 0; left: 0; width: 100%; height: 100%; }

Above: A look at how Chargepoint is becoming an integral part of workplace charging at forward-thinking companies like Adobe (Youtube: Chargepoint)

The new roaming agreement is based on the Open Charge Point Interface (OCPI), part of an open application protocol that allows charging stations and central management systems from different vendors to communicate with each other – in much the same way that cell phone networks do.

“This once-fragmented industry is building momentum towards true driver interoperability thanks to adoption of standards like OCPI that are beneficial to drivers, automakers, grid operators and charging infrastructure providers,” said Lin-Zhuang Khoo, Senior VP, Greenlots. “What’s particularly encouraging about this positive trend is that it is happening in advance of major policy changes or other external forces – a sign that the EV charging market is maturing in concert with surging customer demand for EVs.”

Above: Fiat 500e and Tesla Model S using Chargepoint (Source: Steve Goes Green)

“For more than a decade, ChargePoint has worked to create an open and accessible network that enables drivers to enjoy an effortless charging experience,” said Michael Hughes, Chief Commercial and Revenue Officer of ChargePoint. “We invite other networks to join us in similar partnerships as we seek to make EV charging ubiquitous.”

===

Written by: Charles Morris; This article originally appeared in Charged; Sources: GreenlotsChargePoint

*Editor’s Note: EVANNEX, which also sells aftermarket gear for Teslas, has kindly allowed us to share some of its content with our readers, free of charge. Our thanks go out to EVANNEX. Check out the site here.


Source: Electric Vehicle News

Da Costa Takes Blame For BMW On BMW Crash In Formula E

Antonio Felix da Costa blames himself for the clash between the BMW Andretti team-mates in the ABB FIA Formula E Marrakesh E-Prix, and reckons his teammate Alexander Sims could have won the race.

As the BMW cars ran 1-2, Sims mounted an assault for the lead towards the end of a race that da Costa had led after passing early leader and pole-winner Sam Bird. But the pair locked up going into Turn 7 left-hander and then collided as da Costa – who won the opening round in Saudi Arabia – ran straight on.

He ended up in the barriers and was out of the race, which handed the lead to Mahindra’s Jerome d’Ambrosio, who went on to win, while Sims recovered from the fracas to salvage fourth place.

When asked about the incident by Motorsport.com, da Costa accepted the blame for the incident, which he said “denied the team a win”.

“I’m sorry – that’s a mistake and a mistake coming from me only,” he continued. “[It’s] terribly frustrating in this story because we lost a win, we lost a one-two, and even if it was just me, Alex could have won the race.

“But because of that, I denied him the win, denied the team a one-two. I’m feeling very bad for myself.”

Da Costa also conceded that Sims was the quicker of the two drivers on the day, and felt that he should have yielded the lead.

“He was [quicker] today, yeah, especially at that point,” he said. “In the last 15 laps he was building an edge on me, he had more pace than me.

“I should have accepted that and let him go. I didn’t. The outcome is a combination of many situations that happened in the 40 minutes that we raced.

“When [it] happened, I wanted to find the deepest hole in Marrakesh and put myself in it.”

Sims said “we all take responsibility for it” and suggested that BMW could have communicated more effectively together.

“We all need to learn and work together,” he explained to Motorsport.com. “At that point, I think I had more energy than Antonio by a decent amount, but I just didn’t communicate my feelings with the team well enough.

“Antonio and I get on, it’s not like there’s a breakdown in our relationship and we’re good friends, and we didn’t want this situation to happen obviously. But we’ll learn from it and move on.”

Both drivers reckoned BMW could have considered employing team orders in a bid to preserve the leading positions.

“Why that situation happened, I’ll talk about it with the team later – I would not have minded a team order to tell me to let him go,” said da Costa. “I would not have enjoyed [that], but I think that would have been the thing to do. Again, we will talk internally now and go from there.

“We’re a team, we’re very strong together and I normally put my hand up for mistakes, so I’m putting my hand up for my bit.”

Sims added: “I think there probably would have been [team orders]. That’s something we need to learn.”


Source: Electric Vehicle News

Nissan e-POWER A Huge Sales Success: Why Not Add a Plug?

Nissan e-POWER beat Toyota’s hybrids in Japan

Nissan celebrates a tremendous achievement of selling 136,324 Note cars in Japan last year, which put the model on the top of all models, ahead of Toyota Aqua (126,561), Toyota Prius (115,462) and Nissan Serena minivan (99,865). For comparison, the Nissan LEAF was #35 at 25,722.

We would normally not bother, but both Nissans – Note and Serena – are offered in conventional and a special, series-hybrid version called e-POWER (without plug-in capability).

As it turns out, 70% of all Note sales in 2018 were Note e-Power, which would translate to over 95,000. Since the introduction of Note e-POWER in November 2016, Nissan already sold over 200,000 of those!

The Nissan Note e-POWER shares its electric drivetrain with the all-electric Nissan LEAF and we believe the battery modules are also similar (just a few of them and higher-power versions). e-POWER hybrids alway drive using the electric motor, while the engine/generator only generates electricity.

“The system features an electric drivetrain with a battery that’s charged by a gasoline engine. Because the wheels are driven solely by an electric motor, e-POWER models offer the same smooth, instant acceleration and agile performance as a pure electric vehicle. The gasoline engine, used only to charge the battery, runs at an optimal speed at all times for maximum fuel efficiency.”

Achieving the best sales results among passenger cars and minivans prompts us to ask a question, whether it wouldn’t be worth adding a bigger battery and plug-in capability for a few more grand, as results clearly show that consumers want to drive electric.

The mainstream plug-in hybrid with series-hybrid drivetrain is not a filled up segment outside Japan. The investment costs to introduce e-POWER versions seems minor and in some cases, like with the pickup trucks, it could be a very good idea until BEVs become more popular.

More Nissan e-POWER coming according to Nissan Senior Vice President Asako Hoshino:

“Nissan’s technologies are giving our customers a safer, more enjoyable and more convenient driving experience. You can expect even more to come.”

The Nissan Serena e-POWER Highway STAR V


Source: Electric Vehicle News